!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Jen's Dirty Thirties

please feed the trolls

2005-06-07 / 3:48 p.m.
what ever happened to the beauty in being ugly? point in case: treasure trolls. not designed to be venus de milo. pure kistch, nothing more, nothing less. i've never been a huge fan of these dolls, but i appreciate that they have never been aesthetically beautiful. my favorite fat role model mimi bobeck of the drew carey show loves them.

i don't know how she'll feel now. apparently the dolls have experienced a 'make over'. they have thinner faces and look like those hideous assed 'bratz' dolls, only dwarfed. doe eyes the size of pie tins, lips that look like they've been injected with collagen--these aren't the creatures of ugly comfort any more. they're putrid, simply putrid. if i've piqued your curiosity, good. please take a look at the website-- http://www.trollz.com

did you click on the doll called 'amethyst'? her hair is fucking magenta! why has she been improperly named? she looks NOTHING like my magenta haired freak that sits on the shelf above my computer! according to the website, she says her favorite treat is 'her grandmother's troll house chocolate chip cookies'. the little bitch doesn't even look like she eats anything! i think the toy companies want us to look like aliens, and in hollywood it's taking hold. all of the big butted vixens of yester year have shed their fabulous fat and replaced it with skeletor in drag on acid. have you seen lindsey lohan? what in the fuck happened to her? starr jones? everyone looks like fucking shit. that look ain't pretty, it's U-G-L-Y they ain't got no alibi.

so backtracking to the first paragraph of this entry, does that make them-[hollyweirds version of beautiful that's really ugly] beautiful-(the fact that their ugly)? i'm confused. i feel like i've opened my eyes to an episode of the twilight zone. nothing is sacred anymore. everything is black or white. art is dead.

»«